Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:24:20 -0500
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>, steved@redhat.com,
        rwheeler@redhat.com, bfields@fieldses.org, nfsv4@linux-nfs.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Pull request for FS-Cache, including NFS patches
Message-ID: <20081218142420.GA16728@infradead.org>
References: <8930.1229560221@redhat.com> <20081218224418.804f10bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20081218224418.804f10bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:44:18PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Added from today.
> 
> Usual spiel: all patches in that branch must have been
> 	posted to a relevant mailing list
> 	reviewed
> 	unit tested
> 	destined for the next merge window (or the current release)
> *before* they are included.

I don't think we want fscache for .29 yet.  I'd rather let the
credential code settle for one release, and have more time for actually
reviewing it properly and have it 100% ready for .30.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/