Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758198AbZABQbU (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:31:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756542AbZABQbK (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:31:10 -0500 Received: from rcsinet11.oracle.com ([148.87.113.123]:35885 "EHLO rgminet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754658AbZABQbI (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 11:31:08 -0500 Message-ID: <495E40EE.8080904@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 08:29:34 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap Organization: Oracle Linux Engineering User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Peter W. Morreale" CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, comandante@zaralinux.com, bb@ricochet.net, Rik van Riel , linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] Update of Documentation/ (VM sysctls) References: <20081231212615.12868.97088.stgit@hermosa.site> <495D9222.1060306@oracle.com> <1230909901.3470.242.camel@hermosa.site> In-Reply-To: <1230909901.3470.242.camel@hermosa.site> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt704.oracle.com [141.146.40.82] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A09020B.495E40F2.0256:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1420 Lines: 37 Peter W. Morreale wrote: > On Thu, 2009-01-01 at 20:03 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote: >> Peter W Morreale wrote: > >>> It assumes that patch: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/31/219 has been applied. >>> This is probably wrong since that patch is still being reviewed and not >>> officially accepted as of this patch. Not sure how to handle this at >>> all. >> Yes, this patch should be done first/regardless of your other (pending) patch. >> > > Wait a sec... > > There is a patch interdependency here. > > This patch includes the text for the two proposed sysctls. If they are > rejected, then this help text will refer to two non-existent sysctls. > Minor issue compared to: > > The pdflush sysctl patch was respun to include adding text (against the > current vm.txt) for the new sysctls. So that patch will fail to apply > should this patch be added first. > > See what I mean? So what do I do? Sorry about the confusion. What I meant was that this patch's concept (moving VM sysctls to Doc/sysctl/vm.txt) should be done first (without the new pdflush pieces), then the new pdflush pieces should be done on top of that first patch. Is that clearer? -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/