Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758915AbZABS37 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:29:59 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758735AbZABS3v (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:29:51 -0500 Received: from acsinet11.oracle.com ([141.146.126.233]:26440 "EHLO acsinet11.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757682AbZABS3u (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:29:50 -0500 Message-ID: <495E5CE0.9010800@oracle.com> Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 10:28:48 -0800 From: Randy Dunlap Organization: Oracle Linux Engineering User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070801) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sam Ravnborg CC: Linus Torvalds , Vegard Nossum , Ingo Molnar , David Miller , Andrew Morton , rdreier@cisco.com, ian.campbell@citrix.com, jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com, deller@gmx.de, rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kyle@mcmartin.ca, randolph@tausq.org, dave@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: Disallow GCC 4.1.0 / 4.1.1 References: <20081231105425.9ccac21d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20081231.141408.60544902.davem@davemloft.net> <20090102115547.GB3027@elte.hu> <20090102175737.GA5818@uranus.ravnborg.org> <20090102182735.GC5905@uranus.ravnborg.org> In-Reply-To: <20090102182735.GC5905@uranus.ravnborg.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Source-IP: acsmt703.oracle.com [141.146.40.81] X-Auth-Type: Internal IP X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A09020A.495E5CE6.0066:SCFSTAT928724,ss=1,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1980 Lines: 58 Sam Ravnborg wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2009 at 10:04:27AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> >> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote: >>> Bugger.... >>> Now I cannot do cross compile for: alpha, arm, m68k and sparc. >>> >>> Not that I actually try to run these beasts but just being able >>> to do cross compile has served me well. >> We _could_ make a "CONFIG_COMPILE_ONLY" check, but wouldn't it be even >> nicer to make sure the cross-compiles are something that might actually be >> expected to work? >> >> I realize that cross-tools tend to lag a bit - the pressure to maintain >> them tends to be much lower - but I was sure we had somebody who did a >> reasonable cross-compiler toolchain. Is gcc-4.1 really the most modern >> thing that is easily available? > > Asked google and it found following page: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ > > Architecuter OK? gcc version > --------------------------------- > alpha No gcc 4.0.2 > arm Yes gcc 3.4.5 > ia64 Yes gcc 3.4.5 > m68k Yes gcc 3.4.5 > mips Yes gcc 3.4.5 > sh4 Yes gcc 3.4.5 > sparc Yes gcc 3.4.5 > sparc64 Yes gcc 3.4.5 > x86_64 Yes gcc 3.4.5 > > > So from this list of tool chains we can continue to do cross builds > of all except alpha. > But the gcc version is getting ancient.. > > Why it shall be so hard to do cross build toolchains is above my > imagination but then I also never looked at what it involes. > > Added Vegard that maintain these pages. I doubt that these are any more recent, but the filenames don't say: http://userweb.kernel.org/~akpm/cross-compilers/ Yes, it is an ongoing problem. -- ~Randy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/