Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:03:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:03:44 -0500 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:6151 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 06:03:31 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:03:08 +0100 From: Jens Axboe To: Martin Dalecki Cc: Andre Hedrick , Vojtech Pavlik , Pavel Machek , kernel list Subject: Re: another IDE cleanup: kill duplicated code Message-ID: <20020213120308.Z1907@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20020213074214.S1907@suse.de> <20020213084756.T1907@suse.de> <3C6A4770.2030709@evision-ventures.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3C6A4770.2030709@evision-ventures.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 13 2002, Martin Dalecki wrote: > Jens Axboe wrote: > > >The global read-ahead change is surely not what we want. The IDE > >cleanups I've seen so far look good to me. > > > > Ask Alan Cox - even he saw finally that it's just removal of dead code... Ok I still need to read it, the concern was just that we want to have queue level read-ahead granularity. I'm all for getting rid of the horrid arrays we have now. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/