Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759441AbZACKwe (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:52:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753548AbZACKwZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:52:25 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:53912 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753013AbZACKwY (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 05:52:24 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:52:08 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Rusty Russell Cc: Linus Torvalds , Mike Travis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PULL] cpumask tree Message-ID: <20090103105208.GA19080@elte.hu> References: <200901011149.18401.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090102203839.GA26850@elte.hu> <200901031751.00076.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200901031751.00076.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1651 Lines: 48 * Rusty Russell wrote: > On Saturday 03 January 2009 07:08:40 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > - architectures that have no __fls (8 out of 21) fail to build: > > > > arch/cris > > arch/frv > > arch/h8300 > > arch/m32r > > arch/m68k > > arch/mn10300 > > arch/xtensa > > Fixes pushed, m68k should be OK tho; is this actual compile test? You have > to look in include/asm-m68k to see __fls. yeah, i stopped the tests after the first two build failures - the rest is a grep result from arch/*/, that's why include/asm-m68k/ was left out. > > Rusty, would it be fine with you if we did all the remaining bits via > > tip/cpus4096? It's your tree and your bits and we wanted to send our > > remaining bits after your tree went to Linus but the conflict > > resolutions from Mike are valuable so i think we should reconsider the > > ordering. > > Yeah, no reason for us to do the merge twice. As long as it ends > upstream, I'm a happy camper. great - lets do it that way then. I have pulled your fixes into the cpus4096 tree: 5ece5c5: xtensa: define __fls 5c134da: mn10300: define __fls 16a2062: m32r: define __fls 9ddabc2: h8300: define __fls ee38e51: frv: define __fls 0999769: cris: define __fls Once we have figured out the CPU-hotplug lockdep splat (possibly due to Mike's changes not yours) i'll send it to Linus. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/