Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760075AbZACU3I (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:29:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754353AbZACU2z (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:28:55 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:41828 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751571AbZACU2y (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:28:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 12:28:38 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Ingo Molnar cc: Rusty Russell , Mike Travis , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [git pull] cpus4096 tree, part 3 In-Reply-To: <20090103193859.GB9805@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <200901011149.18401.rusty@rustcorp.com.au> <20090102203839.GA26850@elte.hu> <20090103193859.GB9805@elte.hu> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 768 Lines: 21 On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > ok. The pending regressions are all fixed now, and i've just finished my > standard tests on the latest tree and all the tests passed fine. Ok, pulled and pushed out. Has anybody looked at what the stack size is with MAXSMP set with an allyesconfig? And what areas are still problematic, if any? Are we going to have some code-paths that still essentially have 1kB+ of stack space just because they haven't been converted and still have the cpu mask on stack? Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/