Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932519AbZACWyp (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:54:45 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752934AbZACWyf (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:54:35 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com ([209.85.218.21]:36874 "EHLO mail-bw0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751872AbZACWye (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 17:54:34 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=UJLsDz25RKaGtcIcoEl4jLqGef7RzO/uS8ctIAEWcaKYwGSJlVswJzW/R7X7PAsXnE MKKnvU/77nvjtCOvgH6F/G/BqeMCLEP9FrA/JI1bGa1/ttZbS5l4nazVFfqqQpms87+k W7X3/de9bu+IQzI6pHNdTznQ8Iq83Z1lrVkYI= Message-ID: Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 23:54:30 +0100 From: "Leon Woestenberg" To: "Rob Landley" Subject: Re: PATCH [0/3]: Simplify the kernel build by removing perl. Cc: "Embedded Linux mailing list" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrew Morton" , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Sam Ravnborg" In-Reply-To: <200901020207.30359.rob@landley.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200901020207.30359.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1441 Lines: 36 Hello all, On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:07 AM, Rob Landley wrote: > Before 2.6.25 (specifically git bdc807871d58285737d50dc6163d0feb72cb0dc2 ) > building a Linux kernel never required perl to be installed on the build > system. (Various development and debugging scripts were written in perl and > python and such, but they weren't involved in actually building a kernel.) > Building a kernel before 2.6.25 could be done with a minimal system built from > gcc, binutils, bash, make, busybox, uClibc, and the Linux kernel, and nothing > else. (Embedded developers creating clean cross compile environments that > I agree with Rob that the amount of required dependencies should be kept to a minimum. If we only use 0.5% of a certain language (or: dependent package), then rather implement that 0.5% in the existing language. Dependencies very quickly become dependency hell. If A requires B, then A also inherits all (future) requirements of B, etc. etc. In my daily software development work with Linux and GNU software in general, 10% of it is spent fighting/removing these extremely "thin" or false depencies, so that it is usuable in embedded devices. Regards, -- Leon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/