Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755897AbZADDFY (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:05:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751567AbZADDFH (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:05:07 -0500 Received: from static-71-162-243-5.phlapa.fios.verizon.net ([71.162.243.5]:53408 "EHLO grelber.thyrsus.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751499AbZADDFG (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Jan 2009 22:05:06 -0500 From: Rob Landley Organization: Boundaries Unlimited To: Robert Hancock Subject: Re: PATCH [0/3]: Simplify the kernel build by removing perl. Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:05:00 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.10.1 (Linux/2.6.27-7-generic; KDE/4.1.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Matthieu CASTET , Arkadiusz Miskiewicz , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Embedded Linux mailing list , Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Sam Ravnborg References: <200901020207.30359.rob@landley.net> <200901031346.01325.rob@landley.net> <4960068A.3040109@shaw.ca> In-Reply-To: <4960068A.3040109@shaw.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901032105.00779.rob@landley.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1461 Lines: 31 On Saturday 03 January 2009 18:44:58 Robert Hancock wrote: > Rob Landley wrote: > > For the record, the reason I can't just pregenerate all these suckers on > > a system that's got an arbitrary precision calculator (ala dc) and then > > just ship the resulting header files (more or less the what the first > > version of that first patch did) is that some architectures (arm omap and > > and arm at91) allow you to enter arbitrary HZ values in kconfig. (Their > > help text says that in many cases values that aren't powers of two won't > > work, but nothing enforces this.) So if we didn't have the capability to > > dynamically generate these, you could enter a .config value that would > > break the build. > > Is there a good reason that these archs allow you enter arbitrary HZ > values? Not that I've noticed, no. But you should ask Thomas Gleixner about that about that, I'm not a domain expert... > The use case for using custom HZ values at all nowadays seems > fairly low now that dynticks is around (if that arch supports it > anyway), let alone being able to specify wierd obscure values for it. And high performance event timers. A kernel can have more than one time source these days... Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/