Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757021AbZADNCH (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:02:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750803AbZADNBz (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:01:55 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:58607 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750795AbZADNBz (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 08:01:55 -0500 Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:01:13 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: jeremy@goop.org, beckyb@kernel.crashing.org, jj@chaosbits.net, weiyi.huang@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include Message-ID: <20090104130113.GA24506@elte.hu> References: <20090104112541.GA25434@elte.hu> <20090104210420X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090104121914.GA30255@elte.hu> <20090104214109A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090104214109A.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1437 Lines: 39 * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > In a few days, but wanted to hear back from either Jeremy or Becky > > first about how well they actually work in their usecases. > > Well, you don't need to wait, I think. > > All Jeremy and Becky need is adding highmem support to swiotlb. How we > support it doesn't matter. We can choose better one. > > We all (including Jeremy) agreed that Becky's physical address scheme is > better (simpler) than Jeremy's struct page and offset scheme. Surely, > Becky's scheme works for Xen and him (Jeremy said that he tested it > lightly). Jeremy said, when he submitted this series, shortly before Christmas: >> Here's a work in progress series [...] >> >> Quick testing showed no problems, but I haven't had the chance to do >> anything extensive. Jeremy, did you have a chance to do more testing with the current tip/master bits on Xen, so that we can push it to Linus? > One remaining issue is how to support map_page/unmap_page. As we > discussed, we can add some workarounds for it but it's better to unify > dma_mapping_ops. I send patches to do it after testing them on an IA64 > box tomorrow. ok. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/