Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760417AbZADTFQ (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:05:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756173AbZADTEz (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:04:55 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com ([209.85.218.21]:45148 "EHLO mail-bw0-f21.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755984AbZADTEx (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:04:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=DB3/C0nYFqSpnatYAqeSyXNHfxkyl4IG4yWXn5gSFnX2QRQFSN6H4mvZmRVlK2fdN4 uqjJnoWq8fJLG/42+248+Iq+Yq1rjY0f8wZhDMj8X6r05zEw1GeuSUpFbIu2w34YUgva F3NAt48aSL17RvKqExhlkeY/8cEg6JVCy1zhg= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:04:49 +0100 From: "Leon Woestenberg" To: "Phillip Lougher" Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 00/16] Squashfs: compressed read-only filesystem Cc: "Andrew Morton" , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tim.bird@am.sony.com, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au In-Reply-To: <49606B7C.7050403@lougher.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081028192919.94def38b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <49606B7C.7050403@lougher.demon.co.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1255 Lines: 36 Hello, On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 8:55 AM, Phillip Lougher wrote: >> - what are the limitations of squashfs (please add this to the >> changelog of patch #1 or something). Does it support nfsd? (yes, it >> does!) xatrs and acls? File size limits, entries-per-directory, >> etc, etc? > > Xattrs and acls are not supported, this is a todo. > Filesize limits are in theory 2^64. In practice about 2 TiB. > ... > > Ok. I'll re-spin the patches against 2.6.28 tomorrow (Sunday), and I'll > prepare a tree for linux-next. > For use cases such as embedded firmware, the limitations are non-interesting, and the compression savings are very interesting. Especially where the resulting filesystem has to creep through slow wires such as half duplex serial links etc. Have been using squashfs 2.2 up to 3.4 without problems for years, for distribution of Linux based firmwares into embedded devices. Many thanks for your continued efforts on mainlining squashfs, Regards, -- Leon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/