Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760480AbZADTq6 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:46:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757544AbZADTqr (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:46:47 -0500 Received: from idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca ([24.71.223.10]:47503 "EHLO idcmail-mo1so.shaw.ca" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756460AbZADTqp (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:46:45 -0500 X-Cloudmark-SP-Filtered: true X-Cloudmark-SP-Result: v=1.0 c=0 a=4FvGMXv74iqyoPLWSh0A:9 a=loeXxdYFbKWX8sPIrYXj-byA6zMA:4 a=jbrJJM5MRmoA:10 a=riUlel2XeQwA:10 a=lKFOVNfFU6IA:10 Message-ID: <49611220.6010400@shaw.ca> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 13:46:40 -0600 From: Robert Hancock User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: gmane.linux.acpi.devel,gmane.linux.kernel,gmane.linux.scsi,gmane.linux.ide To: Andi Kleen CC: Linus Torvalds , Arjan van de Ven , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, fweisbec@gmail.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fastboot revisited: Asynchronous function calls References: <20090104092430.7ffd2c41@infradead.org> <20090104103104.6fdda9f2@infradead.org> <87fxjyopie.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> In-Reply-To: <87fxjyopie.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1258 Lines: 27 Andi Kleen wrote: > Linus Torvalds writes: > >> That said, I also wonder if we really even need to autoprobe the >> interrupts on any modern hardware. Rather than trying to speed up irq >> probing, maybe we could figure it out some other way.. > > You'll hate that suggestion, but i8250_pnp should already discover > it fine via ACPI on modern systems. ia64 has done it this way > forever. > > It probably won't work on really old system, but one could always > use DMI year to distingush (not pretty, but works usually) Well, we should be able to tell where we got the port information from, if it's somewhere expected to be reliable like PCI configuration, ISAPnP or PnPACPI, or whether we're just probing magical ports and hoping to find something. The only cases on x86 hardware where I would think probing would have to happen would be where the machine was too old to do either ISA Plug & Play or PnPACPI, or if you added in a non-PnP ISA modem or serial card. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/