Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759850AbZADXNa (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:13:30 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756111AbZADXNH (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:13:07 -0500 Received: from fhw-relay07.plus.net ([212.159.14.148]:52692 "EHLO fhw-relay07.plus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755417AbZADXNG (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:13:06 -0500 Message-ID: <49614284.8040201@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2009 23:13:08 +0000 From: Sitsofe Wheeler User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Rob Landley , kernel list , Andrew Morton , tytso@mit.edu, mtk.manpages@gmail.com, rdunlap@xenotime.net, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: document ext3 requirements References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Plusnet-Relay: cc9e2fea6efa4cacf2d5d7d1e627a146 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 666 Lines: 15 Pavel Machek wrote: > Is there linux filesystem that can handle that? I know jffs2, but > that's unsuitable for stuff like USB thumb drives, right? This raises the question that if nothing can handle it which FS is the least bad? The last I heard people were saying that with cheap SSDs the recommendation was FAT [1] but in the future btrfs, nilfs and logfs would be better. [1] http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/14/129 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/