Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753487AbZAECUj (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:20:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751979AbZAECU2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:20:28 -0500 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:30158 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751969AbZAECU0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:20:26 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references:x-google-sender-auth; b=p+qfHg3NnCf32BFmP4pM2LQN+oIKqzrkQK1F3NHIdQUrrQ0777d+gDtOkmKO1z6PHm 3nsWWeTG0pnRqKfGAIDZJ4jmzYYC9Xn8WLjobD54JNzh9HdV8FXyhsWl0Mp5c0ErsYJG w9yxk4i3WgBInc85z3jIBPmMMrD8AOxQvJTSQ= Message-ID: <9929d2390901041820h4cf51e2h3612108c516b6869@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:20:24 -0800 From: "Jeff Kirsher" To: "David Miller" Subject: Re: [PATCH -net-next 1/4] firmware: convert e100 driver to request_firmware() Cc: jaswinder@infradead.org, linux.nics@intel.com, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20090104.160611.252248503.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <1230626401.24796.22.camel@jaswinder.satnam> <9929d2390812301433pae01ea4g5bfdef6d4d4c7a9c@mail.gmail.com> <20090104.160611.252248503.davem@davemloft.net> X-Google-Sender-Auth: da56912955cf331a Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 998 Lines: 27 On Sun, Jan 4, 2009 at 4:06 PM, David Miller wrote: > From: "Jeff Kirsher" > Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:33:36 -0800 > >> Please hold off on committing, until we have had ample time to do some >> regression testing. While this patch may have been in linux-next, >> this is the first we have seen of it. >> >> I am concerned that IPMI traffic will be adversely affected by this patch. > > Status please? > -- > The only testing left to do is to make sure that ICH devices still work and to make sure the IPMI traffic is not affected by this patch. All other testing looks good. I am sorry that I have been slow to give status, the holiday's have put a strain on available resources. -- Cheers, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/