Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753817AbZAEEks (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:40:48 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752286AbZAEEk2 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:40:28 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:46581 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752173AbZAEEk1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 4 Jan 2009 23:40:27 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18FUG87ws0FnG11BLknzEXWy/rR7VBivft9BWIcnf u3losdRHUS8TX2 Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/8] Tunable sched_mc_power_savings=n From: Mike Galbraith To: svaidy@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Balbir Singh , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20090105032029.GE4301@dirshya.in.ibm.com> References: <20081230062139.GA30038@elte.hu> <20081230180722.GA29060@dirshya.in.ibm.com> <20090102072600.GA13412@dirshya.in.ibm.com> <20090102221630.GF17240@elte.hu> <1230967765.5257.6.camel@marge.simson.net> <20090103101626.GA4301@dirshya.in.ibm.com> <1230981761.27180.10.camel@marge.simson.net> <1231081200.17224.44.camel@marge.simson.net> <20090104181946.GC4301@dirshya.in.ibm.com> <1231098769.5757.43.camel@marge.simson.net> <20090105032029.GE4301@dirshya.in.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 05:40:16 +0100 Message-Id: <1231130416.5479.8.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.58 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2137 Lines: 62 On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 08:50 +0530, Vaidyanathan Srinivasan wrote: > When CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is enabled, the sched domain tree is dumped > (dmesg) Oh, that. I'm dense [ 0.476050] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.476052] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC [ 0.476054] groups: 0 1 [ 0.476057] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU [ 0.476058] groups: 0-1 2-3 [ 0.476062] CPU1 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.476064] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC [ 0.476065] groups: 1 0 [ 0.476067] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU [ 0.476069] groups: 0-1 2-3 [ 0.476072] CPU2 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.476073] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC [ 0.476075] groups: 2 3 [ 0.476077] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU [ 0.476078] groups: 2-3 0-1 [ 0.476081] CPU3 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.476083] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC [ 0.476084] groups: 3 2 [ 0.476086] domain 1: span 0-3 level CPU [ 0.476088] groups: 2-3 0-1 2.6.26.8 [ 0.524043] CPU0 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.524045] domain 0: span 0-1 [ 0.524046] groups: 0 1 [ 0.524049] domain 1: span 0-3 [ 0.524051] groups: 0-1 2-3 [ 0.524054] CPU1 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.524055] domain 0: span 0-1 [ 0.524056] groups: 1 0 [ 0.524059] domain 1: span 0-3 [ 0.524060] groups: 0-1 2-3 [ 0.524063] CPU2 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.524064] domain 0: span 2-3 [ 0.524065] groups: 2 3 [ 0.524068] domain 1: span 0-3 [ 0.524069] groups: 2-3 0-1 [ 0.524072] CPU3 attaching sched-domain: [ 0.524073] domain 0: span 2-3 [ 0.524075] groups: 3 2 [ 0.524077] domain 1: span 0-3 [ 0.524078] groups: 2-3 0-1 > I was actually asking about software threads specified in the sysbench > benchmark. Your have run almost 256 clients on a 4 core box, does > that mean sysbench had 256 worker threads? Yes. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/