Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:10:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:10:11 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:11022 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:10:04 -0500 Message-ID: <3C6A9DEA.5D89D739@mandrakesoft.com> Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:10:02 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: MandrakeSoft X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18-pre8 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Dalecki CC: "David S. Miller" , torvalds@transmeta.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH 2.5.4 i810_audio, bttv, working at all. In-Reply-To: <3C6A5D79.33C31910@mandrakesoft.com> <20020213.084952.68037450.davem@redhat.com> <3C6A9A7F.8020601@evision-ventures.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Dalecki wrote: > > David S. Miller wrote: > > > From: Linus Torvalds > > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:30:48 -0800 (PST) > > > > Basic rule: it's up to _other_ architectures to fix drivers that don't > > work for them. Always has been. Because there's no way you can get the > > people who just want to have something working to care. > > > >And if nobody else ends up doing it, you are right it will be people > >like Jeff and myself doing it. > > > >So what we are asking is to allow a few weeks for that and not crap up > >the tree meanwhile. This is so that the cases that need to be > >converted are harder to find. > > > If you try to use them, then they are not hard to find - things just > break for you and you fix tem. Applying a patch like s/virt_to_bus/virt_to_phys/ makes it more difficult to find the right spots to change later. Patience :) We will fix i810_audio and the other notables. As I noted in the other message just now, i810_audio and bttv fixes are already floating around, and hopefully should appear on lkml or in a Linus pre-patch soon... > If you are fixing things for the "store" Linus is right that indeed it's > just a waiste of time on your behalf. I can tell you it is -not- a waste of time. It's not a waste of time when a vendor appears out of nowhere, having copied a driver of yours. Since you did it right(tm), the vendor driver is portable, even though its original source was for x86-only hardware. It's not a waste of time when people copy your code or learn from your code. It's not a waste of time when spiffy new x86 hardware appears that has useful IOMMU stuff, making a driver's use of the PCI DMA API automatically useful for that new hardware. I agree with Linus that there is little motivation for someone to continue patching a driver, after they have fixed the problem they set out to fix. But that is not the same as saying driver portability is worthless... far from it. Jeff -- Jeff Garzik | "I went through my candy like hot oatmeal Building 1024 | through an internally-buttered weasel." MandrakeSoft | - goats.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/