Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:39:05 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:38:52 -0500 Received: from vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca ([136.159.55.21]:22224 "EHLO vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:38:45 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:38:15 -0700 Message-Id: <200202131738.g1DHcF726164@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> From: Richard Gooch To: "David S. Miller" Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, akpm@zip.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ralf@uni-koblenz.de Subject: Re: [patch] printk and dma_addr_t In-Reply-To: <20020213.033641.102576462.davem@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20020213.013557.74564240.davem@redhat.com> <20020213.033641.102576462.davem@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David S. Miller writes: > From: Alan Cox > Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:23:50 +0000 (GMT) > > So how do they modify the printf format rules in gcc ? > > Because they can claim that they are part of the C environment, and > for the most part they are right so their extensions go into gcc's > magic list. > > In fact I'd claim their case to be plugging holes in the standards > specified set of printf format strings. :-) > > Hey... we could "borrow" one of these printf format strings we > don't have any need for in the kernel and pretend that is for > "dma_addr_t". :-) Eeeep! I know you put a smiley there, but don't even think that! Regards, Richard.... Permanent: rgooch@atnf.csiro.au Current: rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/