Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757299AbZAEPCe (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:02:34 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757057AbZAEPCN (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:02:13 -0500 Received: from mail2.shareable.org ([80.68.89.115]:54239 "EHLO mail2.shareable.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756204AbZAEPCL (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:02:11 -0500 Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:01:56 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: Bernd Petrovitsch Cc: Rob Landley , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Ingo Oeser , Embedded Linux mailing list , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , "H. Peter Anvin" , Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3]: Replace kernel/timeconst.pl with kernel/timeconst.sh Message-ID: <20090105150156.GD14503@shareable.org> References: <200901020207.30359.rob@landley.net> <200901031936.04642.rob@landley.net> <25035.1231045675@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> <200901040043.08577.rob@landley.net> <20090104221356.GA32357@shareable.org> <1231114530.3310.6.camel@gimli.at.home> <20090105022349.GB1345@shareable.org> <1231152378.3326.14.camel@gimli.at.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1231152378.3326.14.camel@gimli.at.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1439 Lines: 35 Bernd Petrovitsch wrote: > I assume that the NFS-mounted root filesystem is a real distribution. Not unless you call uClinux (MMU-less) a real distribution, no. > > (* - No MMU on some ARMs, but I'm working on ARM FDPIC-ELF to add > > proper shared libs. Feel free to fund this :-) > > The above mentioned ARMs have a MMU. Without MMU, it would be truly > insane IMHO. We have similar cross-build issues without MMUs... I.e. that a lot of useful packages don't cross-build properly (including many which use Autoconf), and it might be easier to make a native build environment than to debug and patch all the broken-for-cross-build packages. Especially as sometimes they build, but fail at run-time in some conditions. But you're right it's probably insane to try. I haven't dared as I suspect GCC and/or Binutils would break too :-) I'm sticking instead with "oh well cross-build a few packages by hand and just don't even _try_ to use most of the handy software out there". You mentioned ARM Debian. According to http://wiki.debian.org/ArmEabiPort one recommended method of bootstrapping it is building natively on an emulated ARM, because cross-building is fragile. -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/