Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753885AbZAETIW (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:08:22 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752489AbZAETIM (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:08:12 -0500 Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:43380 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752045AbZAETIL (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:08:11 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs From: James Bottomley To: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox In-Reply-To: <200901052002.15984.bzolnier@gmail.com> References: <200901051952.58029.bzolnier@gmail.com> <20090105185428.GS32491@kernel.dk> <200901052002.15984.bzolnier@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:08:06 -0600 Message-Id: <1231182486.3324.54.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.22.3.1 (2.22.3.1-1.fc9) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4381 Lines: 133 On Mon, 2009-01-05 at 20:02 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > On Monday 05 January 2009, Jens Axboe wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 05 2009, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > > > Subject: [PATCH] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs > > > > > > For some devices (i.e. CFA ATA) we can't reliably detect whether > > > the device is of rotational or non-rotational type so we need to > > > leave the final decision about this setting to the user-space. > > > > I agree with that, was actually planning on doing that myself. > > > > > @@ -146,8 +167,8 @@ static ssize_t queue_nomerges_store(stru > > > queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES, q); > > > else > > > queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES, q); > > > - > > > spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); > > > + > > > return ret; > > > } > > > > > > > Hmm? > > This is just a "bonus". :) > > > > @@ -210,6 +231,12 @@ static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_hw > > > .show = queue_hw_sector_size_show, > > > }; > > > > > > +static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = { > > > + .attr = {.name = "nonrot", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR }, > > > + .show = queue_nonrot_show, > > > + .store = queue_nonrot_store, > > > +}; > > > + > > > > Lets please use a better name for export reasons, non-rotational is a > > lot better. Nobody will know what nonrot means :-) > > Yeah... > > From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > Subject: [PATCH v2] block: export SSD/non-rotational queue flag through sysfs > > For some devices (i.e. CFA ATA) we can't reliably detect whether > the device is of rotational or non-rotational type so we need to > leave the final decision about this setting to the user-space. > > As a bonus do a minor CodingStyle fixup in queue_nomerges_store(). > > Suggested-by: Alan Cox > Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz > --- > block/blk-sysfs.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: b/block/blk-sysfs.c > =================================================================== > --- a/block/blk-sysfs.c > +++ b/block/blk-sysfs.c > @@ -130,6 +130,27 @@ static ssize_t queue_max_hw_sectors_show > return queue_var_show(max_hw_sectors_kb, (page)); > } > > +static ssize_t queue_nonrot_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page) > +{ > + return queue_var_show(blk_queue_nonrot(q), page); > +} > + > +static ssize_t queue_nonrot_store(struct request_queue *q, const char *page, > + size_t count) > +{ > + unsigned long nm; > + ssize_t ret = queue_var_store(&nm, page, count); > + > + spin_lock_irq(q->queue_lock); > + if (nm) > + queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q); > + else > + queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_NONROT, q); > + spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static ssize_t queue_nomerges_show(struct request_queue *q, char *page) > { > return queue_var_show(blk_queue_nomerges(q), page); > @@ -146,8 +167,8 @@ static ssize_t queue_nomerges_store(stru > queue_flag_set(QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES, q); > else > queue_flag_clear(QUEUE_FLAG_NOMERGES, q); > - > spin_unlock_irq(q->queue_lock); > + > return ret; > } > > @@ -210,6 +231,12 @@ static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_hw > .show = queue_hw_sector_size_show, > }; > > +static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nonrot_entry = { > + .attr = {.name = "non-rotational", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR }, > + .show = queue_nonrot_show, > + .store = queue_nonrot_store, > +}; > + > static struct queue_sysfs_entry queue_nomerges_entry = { > .attr = {.name = "nomerges", .mode = S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR }, > .show = queue_nomerges_show, > @@ -229,6 +256,7 @@ static struct attribute *default_attrs[] > &queue_max_sectors_entry.attr, > &queue_iosched_entry.attr, > &queue_hw_sector_size_entry.attr, > + &queue_nonrot_entry.attr, > &queue_nomerges_entry.attr, > &queue_rq_affinity_entry.attr, > NULL, Almost all block devices might find this useful. Ought not this flag to be in the block layer appearing under /sys/block/? James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/