Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752493AbZAFFOZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:14:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750863AbZAFFOL (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:14:11 -0500 Received: from www262.sakura.ne.jp ([202.181.97.72]:56663 "EHLO www262.sakura.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750774AbZAFFOK (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:14:10 -0500 Message-Id: <200901060514.n065E462074929@www262.sakura.ne.jp> Subject: [PATCH] Add in_execve flag into task_struct. From: Tetsuo Handa To: serue@us.ibm.com Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:14:04 +0900 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-2022-JP" X-Anti-Virus: K-Prox Anti-Virus Powered by Kaspersky, bases: 06012009 #1405241, status: clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 642 Lines: 16 Serge, James is now reviewing TOMOYO Linux patch and he is caring about your comment below. Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > I don't like the 'in_exec' bit in the task_struct, but adding LSM hooks > to let just TOMOYO mark whether you're in exec seems even uglier. Let me (once again) ask your comment on 'in_exec' approach originally suggested by David Howells ( http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/2/127 ). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/