Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:04:08 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@gmail.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Data corruption issue with splice() on 2.6.27.10
Message-ID: <20090106100408.GA25957@1wt.eu>
References: <20081224152841.GB13113@1wt.eu> <20090106085442.GA9513@ff.dom.local> <20090106094138.GE25644@1wt.eu> <20090106100112.GB9513@ff.dom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090106100112.GB9513@ff.dom.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1050
Lines: 25

On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:01:13AM +0000, Jarek Poplawski wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 10:41:38AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> ...
> > > Great story! Alas I don't understand this fully either, but it seems
> > > Changli Gao was concerned with sendpage sending this "as pages", so
> > > when NETIF_F_SG flag is available. Did you try this without SG btw?
> > 
> > No I did not. I can try, it's not too hard. It would in part defeat the
> > purpose of the mechanism (especially at 10 Gbps) but at least it will
> > help narrow the problem down.
> 
> Yes, I meant it only as a proof of concept. BTW, delaying TCP acks a
> bit for these sendpages should then make it more reproducible, I guess.

ah ? I can try that too, using iptables on the target machine to drop
a few outgoing acks.

Regards,
Willy

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/