Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753448AbZAFOdo (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:33:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752029AbZAFOde (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:33:34 -0500 Received: from relay3.sgi.com ([192.48.171.31]:35335 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751844AbZAFOde (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:33:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:33:30 -0600 From: Jack Steiner To: Nick Piggin Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Cliff Wickman , Russ Anderson Subject: Re: [patch] x86: make UV support optional Message-ID: <20090106143330.GB18913@sgi.com> References: <20090106060348.GA16738@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090106060348.GA16738@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 651 Lines: 18 On Tue, Jan 06, 2009 at 07:03:48AM +0100, Nick Piggin wrote: > UV is fairly rare.... and much of the support is already there to cope with > 32-bit builds. So this makes sense I think. > Looks ok to me. One suggestion though. There is a MAXSMP config option. I would suggest enabling UV if MAXSMP is enabled. This will help ensure that UV is tested more frequently & may minimize regressions. --- jack -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/