Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:06:49 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:06:33 -0500 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:10761 "HELO netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 18:06:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:05:54 -0200 (BRST) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: To: Allan Sandfeld Cc: Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18-rc1 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Allan Sandfeld wrote: > On Wednesday 13 February 2002 20:33, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > So here it goes. > > > > rc1: > > > - Merge some -ac bugfixes (Alan Cox) > > Here's a crazy idea. Why not branch off the new pre-tree when > commiting a rc-kernel? Since I sit next to marcelo in the office I guess I could answer this question. The reason not to do this is because maintaining a kernel is a horrible amount of work already and marcelo is pretty overloaded with all the patches everybody send him. OTOH, if _you_ volunteer to keep an -ac like kernel yourself so small fixes can be sent to marcelo in batches... cheers, Rik -- "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS" -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/