Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:00:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:59:52 -0500 Received: from adsl-63-194-239-202.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net ([63.194.239.202]:57847 "EHLO mmp-linux.matchmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:59:36 -0500 Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:59:47 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk To: lkml Subject: Re: [patch] sys_sync livelock fix Message-ID: <20020214015947.GD335@matchmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: lkml In-Reply-To: <3C6B06E5.F6A7AD9F@zip.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:49:03AM +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote: > Dangerous advocacy of the broken SuS semantics for sync, has to be stamped > out before it spreads ;-) Daniel, You seem to be taking both sides of this argument. Do you agree that sync should be changed to a checkpoint so that doesn't block for dirty data created *after* sync was called? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/