Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761509AbZAGUkx (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:40:53 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1761170AbZAGUkU (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:40:20 -0500 Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:41101 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761129AbZAGUkR (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:40:17 -0500 Message-ID: <496512D2.2030809@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:38:42 -0500 From: Casey Dahlin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.18 (X11/20081119) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Davide Libenzi CC: Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Linux Kernel , Randy Dunlap , Roland McGrath , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [RESEND][RFC PATCH v2] waitfd References: <49639EB8.40204@redhat.com> <4963ABF0.6070400@redhat.com> <20090107123457.GB16268@elte.hu> <20090107171922.GA18000@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 702 Lines: 23 Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2009, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > >> minor nit... >> >> Please note that unlike other sys_...fd() syscalls, sys_waitfd() >> doesn't allow to pass O_CLOEXEC. Looks like we need a separate >> "flags" argument... > > I said this even during the first post. Not a minor nit unless we want to > have a sys_waitfd2 soon after. > I don't think I properly understood the complaint last time you made it. Fix on the way --CJD -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/