Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759141AbZAHOQo (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:16:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752228AbZAHOQg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:16:36 -0500 Received: from viefep14-int.chello.at ([62.179.121.34]:15431 "EHLO viefep18-int.chello.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751811AbZAHOQg (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Jan 2009 09:16:36 -0500 X-SourceIP: 213.46.9.244 Subject: Re: [BUG] sched: fair group's bug From: Peter Zijlstra To: miaox@cn.fujitsu.com Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linux-Kernel In-Reply-To: <4965573B.60801@cn.fujitsu.com> References: <4965573B.60801@cn.fujitsu.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 15:16:35 +0100 Message-Id: <1231424195.11687.449.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 800 Lines: 16 On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 09:30 +0800, Miao Xie wrote: > I tested fair group scheduler on my hyper-threading x86_64 box(2 CPU * 2 HT) > and found the deviation of the groups' CPU usage was larger than 2.6.26 > when *offline* a CPU or do hotplug frequently. It is less than 1% On 2.6.26,but > On current kernel, it is often greater than 4%, even than 10% by accident. Its not a bug -- a scheduler without smp awareness cannot be compared to one without -- .26 just wasn't a complete group scheduler. At best its a regression for your particular workload. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/