Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291426AbSBNL6p>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:58:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291460AbSBNL6f>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:58:35 -0500
Received: from johnsl.lnk.telstra.net ([139.130.12.152]:23309 "HELO
	ns.higherplane.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id <S291426AbSBNL60>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 06:58:26 -0500
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:58:41 +1100
From: john slee <indigoid@higherplane.net>
To: J Sloan <joe@tmsusa.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: tux officially in kernel?
Message-ID: <20020213135841.GB4826@higherplane.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0202111313100.28040-100000@mustard.heime.net> <3C67F327.8010404@tmsusa.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3C67F327.8010404@tmsusa.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:36:55AM -0800, J Sloan wrote:
> If that's not part of the roadmap I'd be surprised,
> since tux is so much more capable than the
> khttpd which is currently part of the tree.
> 
> Tux has clearly demonstrated it's performance
> and low resource consumption.

it has also been demonstrated that equal performance can be had in
userland (search archives for "X15").  most of tux' improvements have
been generalised and absorbed into the mainline kernel anyway.

j.

-- 
R N G G   "Well, there it goes again... And we just sit 
 I G G G   here without opposable thumbs." -- gary larson
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/