Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:34:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:34:32 -0500 Received: from [195.63.194.11] ([195.63.194.11]:58383 "EHLO mail.stock-world.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 07:34:25 -0500 Message-ID: <3C6BAEBC.3090002@evision-ventures.com> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:34:04 +0100 From: Martin Dalecki User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020205 X-Accept-Language: en-us, pl MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alan Cox CC: Matthias Andree , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18-pre9-mjc2 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Alan Cox wrote: >>>lm_sensors (lm_sensors team) >>> >>Hum, the last time I merged that stuff into my own kernel, the >>patch-generator that they ship did not include all of the drivers I >>needed. Also, I'm missing i2c from your patch list. Is that intentional >>or is the i2c patch not needed? Which lm_sensors version did you merge? >> > >Be very careful merging lm_sensors. Incorrect use of it is a wonderful >way to do things like totally destroy (back to factory) an ibm thinkpad. > Well that is only one single sensor driver... The rest work's rather nicely. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/