Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:47:19 +0100
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Dirk Hohndel <hohndel@infradead.org>,
       "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
       jim owens <jowens@hp.com>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>,
       Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
       Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
       Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>,
       Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
       Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
       linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
       Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>,
       Peter Morreale <pmorreale@novell.com>,
       Sven Dietrich <SDietrich@novell.com>, jh@suse.cz
Subject: Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact
Message-ID: <20090109174719.GG26290@one.firstfloor.org>
References: <20090108183306.GA22916@elte.hu> <496648C7.5050700@zytor.com> <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901081943150.6528@localhost.localdomain> <20090109130057.GA31845@elte.hu> <49675920.4050205@hp.com> <20090109153508.GA4671@elte.hu> <49677CB1.3030701@zytor.com> <20090109084620.3c711aad@infradead.org> <20090109172011.GD26290@one.firstfloor.org> <20090109172801.GC6936@parisc-linux.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20090109172801.GC6936@parisc-linux.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 915
Lines: 28

On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 10:28:01AM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 06:20:11PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > Also cc Honza in case he has comments (you might want
> > to review more of the thread in the archives) 
> 
> I think this particular bug is already known and discussed:

I thought so initially too, but:

> 
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2008-12/msg00365.html
> 
> and it hints at being fixed with gcc 4.4.  Does anyone want to test
> that?

Hugh already tested with 4.4 and it didn't work well. At least
a lot of the low level asm inlines were not inlined.
So it looks like it's still mistuned for the kernel.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/