Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754376AbZAISOz (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:14:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752524AbZAISOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:14:47 -0500 Received: from 8bytes.org ([88.198.83.132]:49207 "EHLO 8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751684AbZAISOr (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:14:47 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:14:46 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: Evgeniy Polyakov Cc: Joerg Roedel , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] dma-debug: add hash functions for dma_debug_entries Message-ID: <20090109181446.GB9466@8bytes.org> References: <1231517970-20288-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <1231517970-20288-4-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@amd.com> <20090109175542.GB30168@ioremap.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090109175542.GB30168@ioremap.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1866 Lines: 62 On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 08:55:42PM +0300, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Hi Joerg. > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2009 at 05:19:17PM +0100, Joerg Roedel (joerg.roedel@amd.com) wrote: > > +/* > > + * Request exclusive access to a hash bucket for a given dma_debug_entry. > > + */ > > +static struct hash_bucket *get_hash_bucket(struct dma_debug_entry *entry, > > + unsigned long *flags) > > +{ > > + int idx = hash_fn(entry); > > + unsigned long __flags; > > + > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&dma_entry_hash[idx].lock, __flags); > > + *flags = __flags; > > + return &dma_entry_hash[idx]; > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Give up exclusive access to the hash bucket > > + */ > > +static void put_hash_bucket(struct hash_bucket *bucket, > > + unsigned long *flags) > > +{ > > + unsigned long __flags = *flags; > > + > > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bucket->lock, __flags); > > +} > > Why do you need such ugly helpers? Because everything else I thought about here was even more ugly. But maybe you have a better idea? I tried to lock directly in the debug_ functions. But this is ugly and unnecessary code duplication. > > > + * Add an entry to a hash bucket > > + */ > > +static void hash_bucket_add(struct hash_bucket *bucket, > > + struct dma_debug_entry *entry) > > +{ > > + list_add_tail(&entry->list, &bucket->list); > > +} > > > +/* > > + * Remove entry from a hash bucket list > > + */ > > +static void hash_bucket_del(struct dma_debug_entry *entry) > > +{ > > + list_del(&entry->list); > > +} > > Do you really need this getting they are called only from single place? Hmm, true. I will inline these functions. Joerg -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/