Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S291649AbSBNNml>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:42:41 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S291654AbSBNNmc>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:42:32 -0500
Received: from krusty.E-Technik.Uni-Dortmund.DE ([129.217.163.1]:48394 "EHLO
	krusty.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S291649AbSBNNmW>; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:42:22 -0500
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:42:17 +0100
From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>
To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.18-rc1
Message-ID: <20020214134217.GA1870@merlin.emma.line.org>
Mail-Followup-To: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.4.44.0202141404210.25879-100000@mimas.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de> <E16bM7s-0008TY-00@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E16bM7s-0008TY-00@the-village.bc.nu>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> Or just comment out the Config.in line for it ?

Carrying around KNOWN dead code in a release kernel? Not too
sensible, is it?

-- 
Matthias Andree

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."         Benjamin Franklin
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/