Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756222AbZAIUaV (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:30:21 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752669AbZAIU3u (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:29:50 -0500 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.125]:45649 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751717AbZAIU3s (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:29:48 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:29:46 -0500 (EST) From: Steven Rostedt X-X-Sender: rostedt@gandalf.stny.rr.com To: Nicholas Miell cc: Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , jim owens , "H. Peter Anvin" , Chris Mason , Peter Zijlstra , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Gregory Haskins , Matthew Wilcox , Andi Kleen , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-fsdevel , linux-btrfs , Thomas Gleixner , Nick Piggin , Peter Morreale , Sven Dietrich Subject: Re: [patch] measurements, numbers about CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y impact In-Reply-To: <1231532276.2081.12.camel@entropy> Message-ID: References: <20090108141808.GC11629@elte.hu> <1231426014.11687.456.camel@twins> <1231434515.14304.27.camel@think.oraclecorp.com> <20090108183306.GA22916@elte.hu> <496648C7.5050700@zytor.com> <20090109130057.GA31845@elte.hu> <49675920.4050205@hp.com> <20090109153508.GA4671@elte.hu> <1231532276.2081.12.camel@entropy> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (DEB 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2379 Lines: 65 On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, Nicholas Miell wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 08:28 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > > We get oopses that have a nice symbolic back-trace, and it reports an > > error IN TOTALLY THE WRONG FUNCTION, because gcc "helpfully" inlined > > things to the point that only an expert can realize "oh, the bug was > > actually five hundred lines up, in that other function that was just > > called once, so gcc inlined it even though it is huge". > > > > See? THIS is the problem with gcc heuristics. It's not about quality of > > code, it's about RELIABILITY of code. > > [bt]$ cat backtrace.c > #include > > static void called_once() > { > abort(); > } > > int main(int argc, char* argv[]) > { > called_once(); > return 0; > } > [bt]$ gcc -Wall -O2 -g backtrace.c -o backtrace > [bt]$ gdb --quiet backtrace > (gdb) disassemble main > Dump of assembler code for function main: > 0x00000000004004d0 : sub $0x8,%rsp > 0x00000000004004d4 : callq 0x4003b8 > End of assembler dump. > (gdb) run > Starting program: /home/nicholas/src/bitbucket/bt/backtrace > > Program received signal SIGABRT, Aborted. > 0x0000003d9dc32f05 in raise (sig=) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 > 64 return INLINE_SYSCALL (tgkill, 3, pid, selftid, sig); > (gdb) bt > #0 0x0000003d9dc32f05 in raise (sig=) at ../nptl/sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/raise.c:64 > #1 0x0000003d9dc34a73 in abort () at abort.c:88 > #2 0x00000000004004d9 in called_once () at backtrace.c:5 > #3 main (argc=3989, argv=0xf95) at backtrace.c:10 > (gdb) > > > Maybe the kernel's backtrace code should be fixed instead of blaming > gcc. Try doing the same without compiling with -g. I believe Andi has a patch to use the DWARF markings for backtrace (I'm sure he'll correct me if I'm wrong ;-), but things like ftrace that use kallsyms to get the names of functions and such does better when the functions are not inlined. Not to mention that the function tracer does not trace inlined functions so that's another downside of inlining. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/