Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758106AbZAIVoQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:44:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754104AbZAIVoA (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:44:00 -0500 Received: from solo.fdn.fr ([80.67.169.19]:52016 "EHLO solo.fdn.fr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753138AbZAIVn7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:43:59 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:43:57 +0100 From: Samuel Thibault To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re (hello?): [PATCH] Let keyboard notifiers modify key codes Message-ID: <20090109214357.GH5073@const.famille.thibault.fr> Mail-Followup-To: Samuel Thibault , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org References: <20090107005813.GA4987@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090109212358.GG5073@const.famille.thibault.fr> <20090109213555.7f9275c9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20090109213555.7f9275c9@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.12-2006-07-14 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1449 Lines: 34 Alan Cox, le Fri 09 Jan 2009 21:35:55 +0000, a ?crit : > Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Came somebody have a look at this? The need is real, the only question > > that comes to my mind is whether notifiers are allowed to modify the > > param they are given. Since they are not marked const, I'd guess it'd > > be ok? > > The notifier code doesn't care. I know, but I'm asking about current practice. > > Make kbd_keycode() read param.value after calling the keyboard notification > > chain, to let the callee change the translation on the fly. This for instance > > permits to remap the physical positions of the keys independently of the > > configured keymap, for e.g. single-handed people. > > Surely that is just a new keymap ? No. That would mean a lot of keymapSSS. Doing it the keymap way would require to have us, us-revert-left, us-revert-right, en-uk, uk-revert-left, uk-revert-right, etc. I really don't like that approach, thus the "independently of the configured keymap". This really is a problem that is orthogonal to keymaps: I'm here talking about _physical_ keys remapping, not remapping what is printed on them (which is done after that). Samuel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/