Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753272AbZAKEWn (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:22:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751808AbZAKEWf (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:22:35 -0500 Received: from sh.osrg.net ([192.16.179.4]:42988 "EHLO sh.osrg.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751086AbZAKEWe (ORCPT ); Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:22:34 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 13:22:10 +0900 To: mingo@elte.hu Cc: fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp, Ian.Campbell@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeremy@goop.org, jj@chaosbits.net, weiyi.huang@gmail.com, beckyb@kernel.crashing.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Re: swiotlb: remove duplicated #include From: FUJITA Tomonori In-Reply-To: <20090111040428.GE28520@elte.hu> References: <20090111035527.GC28520@elte.hu> <20090111130018X.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20090111040428.GE28520@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20090111132204L.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1532 Lines: 40 On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 05:04:28 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 04:55:27 +0100 > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > > > > > * Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 18:10 +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > > > > > > > Patch is against Jeremy's Xen patch queue which is based on a pre-Xmas > > > > > tip tree so fairly out of date, I hope it is somewhat useful though. > > > > > > > > Here's a version again tip-latest, only compile tested though since my > > > > testing relies on the Xen dom0 patch queue. > > > > > > Applied them to tip/core/iommu: > > > > > > 961d7d0: swiotlb: do not use sg_virt() > > > 0b8698a: swiotlb: range_needs_mapping should take a physical address. > > > > I think that Xen camp wants these changes for 2.6.29. Are you trying to > > push tip/core/iommu for 2.6.29? > > Yet unclear, depends on testing. Will probably wait for 2.6.30 though. Thanks, I see. Probably, it will get tons of conflict due to the dma API unification touching everywhere. BTW, what happened to? http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123125853906986&w=2 It's better to have these (especially Becky's work) in mainline now. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/