Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:18:25 +0100
From: Paul Rolland (=?UTF-8?B?44Od44O844Or44O744Ot44Op44Oz?=) 
	<rol@witbe.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, rol@witbe.net
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.29-rc1
Message-ID: <20090111111825.49eaee0d@tux.DEF.witbe.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901101551420.6528@localhost.localdomain>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0901101551420.6528@localhost.localdomain>
Organization: Witbe.net
Face: 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
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2095
Lines: 47

Hello,

On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> 
> The merge window is over, and while it is quite possible that I missed a 
> few merge requests in the crazy week that is behind us, apart from those 
> we should now have most of the bulk of 2.6.29 merged up. And now it's
> just a small matter of making sure it's all stable and ready to go.
> 

Don't know if this is important or not, but I have :

WARNING: net/dccp/dccp.o(.text+0xf6): Section mismatch in reference from the function ccid_cleanup_builtins() to the function .exit.text:tfrc_lib_exit()
The function ccid_cleanup_builtins() references a function in an exit section.
Often the function tfrc_lib_exit() has valid usage outside the exit section
and the fix is to remove the __exit annotation of tfrc_lib_exit.

WARNING: net/dccp/dccp.o(.init.text+0x53): Section mismatch in reference from the function ccid_initialize_builtins() to the function .exit.text:tfrc_lib_exit()
The function __init ccid_initialize_builtins() references
a function __exit tfrc_lib_exit().
This is often seen when error handling in the init function
uses functionality in the exit path.
The fix is often to remove the __exit annotation of
tfrc_lib_exit() so it may be used outside an exit section.

Regards,
Paul

-- 
Paul Rolland                                E-Mail : rol(at)witbe.net
CTO - Witbe.net SA                          Tel. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 77
Les Collines de l'Arche                     Fax. +33 (0)1 47 67 77 99
F-92057 Paris La Defense                    RIPE : PR12-RIPE

Please no HTML, I'm not a browser - Pas d'HTML, je ne suis pas un
navigateur "Some people dream of success... while others wake up and work
hard at it" 

"And they told us, what they wanted...
 Was a sound that could kill some-one, from a distance." -- Kate Bush
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/