Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752177AbZAKLtU (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:49:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751150AbZAKLtK (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:49:10 -0500 Received: from 93-97-173-237.zone5.bethere.co.uk ([93.97.173.237]:63373 "EHLO tim.rpsys.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750755AbZAKLtJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:49:09 -0500 Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] LED updates for 2.6.29 From: Richard Purdie To: Trent Piepho Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , LKML , Guennadi Liakhovetski , linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org In-Reply-To: References: <1231500186.5317.9.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1231543199.5317.63.camel@dax.rpnet.com> <1231633983.5330.32.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:49:19 +0000 Message-Id: <1231674559.5304.13.camel@dax.rpnet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1611 Lines: 37 On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 21:43 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > On Sun, 11 Jan 2009, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 04:31 -0800, Trent Piepho wrote: > > > The LED tree makes more sense for what's left I think. There was a > > > openfirmware gpio patch, but that's already gone in. What's left only > > > touches led files and the device tree binding docs. > > > > > > AFAIK, there were no objections to the patches left. > > > > Ok, these are now queued in the LED tree: > > > > http://git.o-hand.com/cgit.cgi/linux-rpurdie-leds/log/ > > > > I did merge the last three patches in one and make some changes to deal > > with some other outstanding issues. Let me know ASAP if there are any > > problems. > > Since the last patch looks like it's just my three patches folded into one, > shouldn't I be listed as the author and the primary signed off by? I made changes other than just merging the three together (the syspend/resume change and the bitfield parts in leds.h) so putting you as signed off by/authorship would not have been "correct" and I credited you in the commit message instead. I wanted to get the missing patches queued ASAP so I went with the way that does fit in the rules as you'd not have been happy if a modified patch was attributed to you. I'll put you as author and a signoff if you confirm thats acceptable. Cheers, Richard -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/