Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129842AbQJ0Qps>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:45:48 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129958AbQJ0Qpi>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:45:38 -0400
Received: from mail.perfectionlearning.com ([207.177.35.146]:28412 "EHLO
	catbert.desm.plconline.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129842AbQJ0QpV>; Fri, 27 Oct 2000 12:45:21 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 11:31:52 -0500 (CDT)
From: David Weis <djweis@sjdjweis.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: GPL Question
In-Reply-To: <39F9AF0E.70406@triad.rr.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10010271130550.23907-100000@catbert.desm.plconline.com>
Approved: postmaster@plconline.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org



On Fri, 27 Oct 2000, Jason Wohlgemuth wrote:

> Now, if a module is loaded that registers a set of functions that have 
> increased functionality compared to the original functions, if that 
> modules is not based off GPL'd code, must the source code of that module 
> be released under the GPL?

It would probably follow GPL, but it's pretty slimy. I won't buy it.

david

-- 
David Weis                | "Great spirits will always encounter violent
djweis@sjdjweis.com       | opposition from mediocre minds" - Einstein
http://www.sjdjweis.com/  |

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/