Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753994AbZAKQal (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:30:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752177AbZAKQab (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:30:31 -0500 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:34966 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751308AbZAKQaa (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:30:30 -0500 Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:29:49 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Jeff Chua Cc: Christian Borntraeger , Daniel Drake , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Phil Dibowitz Subject: Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Message-ID: <20090111162949.GA15338@elte.hu> References: <4969FD64.8040408@gentoo.org> <200901111518.38880.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ELTE-VirusStatus: clean X-ELTE-SpamScore: -1.5 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-1.5 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.3 -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2243 Lines: 58 * Jeff Chua wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Christian Borntraeger > wrote: > > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> > of recent regressions. > >> > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > >> > (either way). > >> > > >> > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua > >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > >> > >> The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. > >> Jeff, do you even have that camera? > >> > >> It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the > >> unusual_devs entry for it. > > > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 > > This was committed earlier than > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel > that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume > breaks. so you mean a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 seems good, while the next step in Linus's tree, 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 is already broken? Does 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 start working if you do: git checkout 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 git revert a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 ? That would implicate a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 + some layout/timing problem - which does not trigger for some reason if pure a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is tried. Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/