Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753962AbZAKQgg (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:36:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751661AbZAKQg1 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:36:27 -0500 Received: from mtagate8.uk.ibm.com ([195.212.29.141]:43087 "EHLO mtagate8.uk.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751544AbZAKQg0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:36:26 -0500 From: Christian Borntraeger To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [Bug #12422] 2.6.28-git can't resume from str Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:36:24 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.9 Cc: Jeff Chua , Daniel Drake , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Phil Dibowitz References: <20090111162949.GA15338@elte.hu> In-Reply-To: <20090111162949.GA15338@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200901111736.24350.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2163 Lines: 52 Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Ingo Molnar: > > * Jeff Chua wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Christian Borntraeger > > wrote: > > > Am Sonntag 11 Januar 2009 schrieb Daniel Drake: > > >> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > >> > of recent regressions. > > >> > > > >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > >> > from 2.6.28. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > > >> > (either way). > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12422 > > >> > Subject : 2.6.28-git can't resume from str > > >> > Submitter : Jeff Chua > > >> > Date : 2009-01-10 1:39 (2 days old) > > >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123155157909282&w=4 > > >> > > >> The bisection looks invalid. It is unlikely to be this commit at fault. > > >> Jeff, do you even have that camera? > > >> > > >> It is also easy to revert that commit by hand. Just delete the > > >> unusual_devs entry for it. > > > > > > I found a nearby commit during bisect, which looks much saner: > > > > > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123167815028388&w=2 > > > > This was committed earlier than > > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388, and > > a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 was the last working kernel > > that is able to suspend/resume. Go one before, and suspend/resume > > breaks. > > so you mean a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 seems good, while the > next step in Linus's tree, 52fefcec97c25b15887e6a9a885ca54e7f7c0928 is > already broken? I guess Jeff, meant the other way around. Since a0e280e0f33f6c859a235fb69a875ed8f3420388 is a fix for a known S2R problem , the earlier patch (before) does of course not work. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/