Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753682AbZAKXMT (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:12:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750986AbZAKXMG (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:12:06 -0500 Received: from pan.madism.org ([88.191.52.104]:49101 "EHLO hermes.madism.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750780AbZAKXME (ORCPT ); Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:12:04 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 560 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:12:04 EST Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 00:02:40 +0100 From: Pierre Habouzit To: Alexey Zaytsev Cc: Sam Ravnborg , Linus Torvalds , Christian Borntraeger , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: current git kernel has strange problems during bisect Message-ID: <20090111230240.GA27489@artemis.corp> Mail-Followup-To: Alexey Zaytsev , Sam Ravnborg , Linus Torvalds , Christian Borntraeger , Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List References: <200901111602.53082.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200901111607.59054.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <200901111620.03345.borntraeger@de.ibm.com> <20090111194258.GA4840@uranus.ravnborg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=SHA1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Face: $(^e[V4D-[`f2EmMGz@fgWK!e.B~2g.{08lKPU(nc1J~z\4B>*JEVq:E]7G-\6$Ycr4<;Z!|VY6Grt]+RsS$IMV)f>2)M="tY:ZPcU;&%it2D81X^kNya0=L]"vZmLP+UmKhgq+u*\.dJ8G!N&=EvlD User-Agent: Madmutt/devel (Linux) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2622 Lines: 70 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 07:47:18PM +0000, Alexey Zaytsev wrote: > On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 22:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > >> > >> For bisect, it's indeed somewhat annoying, and we could have perhaps d= one > >> some things a bit differently, but it's about the closest you can get = to > >> "real history" without making the first btrfs merge-point a _total_ > >> disaster. > >> > >> For bisect purposes, if you know you're not chasing down a btrfs issue, > >> you can do > >> > >> git bisect good 34353029534a08e41cfb8be647d734b9ce9ebff8 > >> > >> where that commit 34353029 is the last one which has _just_ the btrfs > >> files. The next commit is when it does "Merge Btrfs into fs/btrfs", and > >> that one has the whole kernel tree again. > > > > The cost of moving this piece of history from one git tree to another > > git tree is that we make it harder to debug the kernel for the advanced= user > > that knows how to do bisect. >=20 > And wasn't is trivial to avoid? Just exporting the commits as > patches and importing them into the kernel tree would preserve > the history, and not break bisection. And would have brought a whole history of totally irrelevant stuff that never exited for real, with probably a lot of non-compiling sub-steps which would be even worse. No, the two possible choices were to squash the whole stuff at once, or do what has been done IMNSHO. People have to grok how to take shortcuts with git-bisect. I know that git-bisect puts people on the brainless course of actions where they git-bisect; configure; compile; boot; test; mark as good/bad and retry. And that's what I sometimes don't like with it. Because people trust git-bisect too much and forget how to think right. --=20 =C2=B7O=C2=B7 Pierre Habouzit =C2=B7=C2=B7O madcoder@debia= n.org OOO http://www.madism.org --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAklqeo4ACgkQvGr7W6Hudhz4lgCeKcYQJuqGwLCVuxhlJSeoJyFx xkUAnjQN9pI7xbCkMODK1zYLNGn4QuiH =EZOU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/