Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:50:33 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:50:24 -0500 Received: from smtp3.vol.cz ([195.250.128.83]:40720 "EHLO smtp3.vol.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:50:12 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:13:58 +0100 From: Pavel Machek To: Eugene Chupkin Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tmeagher@credit.com Subject: Re: 2.4.x ram issues? Message-ID: <20020214191356.GB160@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi! > I have a problem with high ram support on 2.4.7 to 2.4.17 all behave the > same. I have a quad Xeon 700 box with 16gb of ram on an Intel SKA4 board. > The ram is all the same 16 1gb PC100 SDRAM modules from Crucial. If I > compile the kernel with high ram (64gb) support, my system runs very slow, > it takes about 15 minutes for make menuconfig to come up. If I recompile > the kernel with 4gb support, it runs perfectly normal and very fast, but I > have 12 gigs that I can't use. Is this a known issue? Is there a fix? I > tried just about everything and I am all out of options. Please help! What happens with 8GB? Pavel -- (about SSSCA) "I don't say this lightly. However, I really think that the U.S. no longer is classifiable as a democracy, but rather as a plutocracy." --hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/