Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753912AbZALKk3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:40:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751861AbZALKkT (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:40:19 -0500 Received: from yw-out-2324.google.com ([74.125.46.29]:55564 "EHLO yw-out-2324.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750856AbZALKkQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:40:16 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=dUjYxfovIbg9Lzj/t4VtQlle0FgnuoU8D008YZosMYFilJsYt/issyxk68C2F5mnUO WcRoobSHHB633J+JDbdTRl/3bHMmsXX+HKhowHn+naKklBdWyT1mtUg4YvZoSpgSu8Sy LHNtpzaEYO1XkBwMdYQcT7Uwyw1nta4CTt5mA= Message-ID: Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:40:15 +0300 From: "Alexander Beregalov" To: "Thomas Gleixner" Subject: Re: 2.6.28-rc6: hpet: object is on stack, but not annotated Cc: "Pavel Machek" , "Kernel Testers List" , LKML , mingo@elte.hu, venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com, shaohua.li@intel.com In-Reply-To: <20081204111621.GA2466@elf.ucw.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <20081204111621.GA2466@elf.ucw.cz> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1187 Lines: 30 2008/12/4 Pavel Machek : > On Mon 2008-11-24 19:17:44, Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Nov 2008, Alexander Beregalov wrote: >> >> > 2008/11/24 Alexander Beregalov : >> > > hpet0: at MMIO 0xfed00000, IRQs 2, 8, 0 >> > > hpet0: 3 comparators, 64-bit 14.318180 MHz counter >> > > ODEBUG: object is on stack, but not annotated >> > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ >> > > WARNING: at lib/debugobjects.c:251 __debug_object_init+0x2a4/0x352() >> > >> > Bisected down to 26afe5f2fbf06ea0765aaa316640c4dd472310c0 >> > (x86: HPET_MSI Initialise per-cpu HPET timers) >> > >> > Revert helps >> >> That's just a warning about a missing annotation. The commit is fine. > > You must be using very different metric of what "fine" means than rest > of the world. > > (No, introducing WARN_ON()s is not fine; it spams kerneloops.org at least...) The warning is still here on 2.6.29-rc1. It taints the kernel. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/