Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:58:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:56:40 -0500 Received: from gatekeeper-WAN.credit.com ([209.155.225.68]:18579 "EHLO gatekeeper") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:55:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:54:56 -0800 (PST) From: Eugene Chupkin To: Pavel Machek cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tmeagher@credit.com Subject: Re: 2.4.x ram issues? In-Reply-To: <20020214191356.GB160@elf.ucw.cz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > I have a problem with high ram support on 2.4.7 to 2.4.17 all behave the > > same. I have a quad Xeon 700 box with 16gb of ram on an Intel SKA4 board. > > The ram is all the same 16 1gb PC100 SDRAM modules from Crucial. If I > > compile the kernel with high ram (64gb) support, my system runs very slow, > > it takes about 15 minutes for make menuconfig to come up. If I recompile > > the kernel with 4gb support, it runs perfectly normal and very fast, but I > > have 12 gigs that I can't use. Is this a known issue? Is there a fix? I > > tried just about everything and I am all out of options. Please help! > > What happens with 8GB? > Pavel > -- I didn't test with 8gb since I administrate it remotely, but 16gb is still having issues with load jumping very high on IO. I think it needs more work. -E - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/