Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:34:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:33:56 -0500 Received: from freeside.toyota.com ([63.87.74.7]:55312 "EHLO freeside.toyota.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:33:44 -0500 Message-ID: <3C6C4942.4050305@lexus.com> Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:33:22 -0800 From: J Sloan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.8) Gecko/20020204 X-Accept-Language: en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: john slee CC: J Sloan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tux officially in kernel? In-Reply-To: <3C67F327.8010404@tmsusa.com> <20020213135841.GB4826@higherplane.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org john slee wrote: >On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 08:36:55AM -0800, J Sloan wrote: > >>If that's not part of the roadmap I'd be surprised, >>since tux is so much more capable than the >>khttpd which is currently part of the tree. >> >>Tux has clearly demonstrated it's performance >>and low resource consumption. >> > >it has also been demonstrated that equal performance can be had in >userland (search archives for "X15") > Well, I don't know about "equal" but many webservers have benefitted from the tux related kernel enhancements - yes I know about X15, I tested it out too... It's fast, but tux is faster. >. most of tux' improvements have >been generalised and absorbed into the mainline kernel anyway. > Granted - So, just out of curioisity, why is khttpd in the kernel? If there were any web server in the mainline kernel I'd think it'd be tux - Best Regards, Joe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/