Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757277AbZALVOS (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:14:18 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753242AbZALVOE (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:14:04 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:53962 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753440AbZALVOD (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:14:03 -0500 Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2009 13:13:21 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Alexander Clouter Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [REPOST] timer iomem hwrng driver Message-Id: <20090112131321.b3b8b7b9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20081230145209.GA26015@woodchuck> References: <20081230145209.GA26015@woodchuck> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 7231 Lines: 258 On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 14:52:10 +0000 Alexander Clouter wrote: > Hi, > > I submitted this some time back but got no 'love' from the community[1] > so I'm reposting it. > > Some hardware platforms, the TS-7800[2] is one for example, can supply > the kernel with an entropy source, albeit a slow one for TS-7800 users, > by just reading a particular IO address. This source must not be read > above a certain rate otherwise the quality is not suitable. > > The driver is then hooked into by calling > platform_device_(register|add|del) passing a structure similar to: > ------------ > #define TS_RNG (TS78XX_FPGA_REGS_VIRT_BASE | 0x044) > > static struct timeriomem_rng_data ts78xx_ts_rng_data = { > .address = (u32 *__iomem) TS_RNG, > .period = 1000000, /* one second */ > }; > > static struct platform_device ts78xx_ts_rng_device = { > .name = "timeriomem_rng", > .id = -1, > .dev = { > .platform_data = &ts78xx_ts_rng_data, > }, > .num_resources = 0, > }; > ------------ > questions... > +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/timeriomem-rng.c > @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ > +/* > + * drivers/char/hw_random/timeriomem-rng.c > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2008 Alexander Clouter > + * > + * Derived from drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c > + * Copyright 2005 (c) MontaVista Software, Inc. > + * Author: Deepak Saxena > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + * > + * Overview: > + * This driver is useful for platforms that have an IO range that provides > + * periodic random data from a single IO memory address. All the platform > + * has to do is provide the address and 'wait time' that new data becomes > + * available. > + * > + * TODO: add support for reading sizes other than 32bits and masking > + */ > + > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > +#include > + > +static struct timeriomem_rng_data *timeriomem_rng_data; > + > +static void timeriomem_rng_trigger(unsigned long); > +static DEFINE_TIMER(timeriomem_rng_timer, &timeriomem_rng_trigger, 0, 0); > + > +/* > + * have data return 1, however return 0 if we have nothing > + */ > +static int timeriomem_rng_data_present(struct hwrng *rng, int wait) > +{ > + s32 delay; > + > + if (rng->priv == 0) > + return 1; > + > + if (timer_pending(&timeriomem_rng_timer)) { > + if (!wait) > + return 0; > + > + del_timer(&timeriomem_rng_timer); > + delay = (long)timeriomem_rng_timer.expires - (long)jiffies; > + > + schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(delay); > + } > + > + return 1; > +} Would it be better (less racy) to do if (del_timer(&timeriomem_rng_timer)) { if (!wait) return 0; delay = (long)timeriomem_rng_timer.expires - (long)jiffies; schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(delay); } Secondly, can `delay' be negative, if jiffies increments at just the right (ie: wrong) time? Thirdly, why the typecasts in the calculation of `delay'? Both terms already have type `unsigned long'. Fourthly, should it use del_timer_sync()? Bear in mind that the timer handler might be concurrently running on another CPU. > +static int timeriomem_rng_data_read(struct hwrng *rng, u32 *data) > +{ > + u32 cur; > + s32 delay; > + > + *data = *timeriomem_rng_data->address; This is reading from I/O memory. It should use readl()? > + if (rng->priv != 0) { > + cur = jiffies; > + > + delay = (long)cur - (long)timeriomem_rng_timer.expires; bug: `cur' should have type `unsigned long'. The u32 can get truncated. Then, the casts are unneeded. > + delay = rng->priv - (delay % rng->priv); > + > + timeriomem_rng_timer.expires = cur + delay; > + add_timer(&timeriomem_rng_timer); > + } > + > + return 4; > +} > + > +static void timeriomem_rng_trigger(unsigned long dummy) > +{ > + del_timer(&timeriomem_rng_timer); > +} del_timer_sync()? > +static struct hwrng timeriomem_rng_ops = { > + .name = "timeriomem", > + .data_present = timeriomem_rng_data_present, > + .data_read = timeriomem_rng_data_read, > + .priv = 0, > +}; > + > +static int __init timeriomem_rng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + int ret; > + > + timeriomem_rng_data = pdev->dev.platform_data; > + > + if (timeriomem_rng_data->period != 0 > + && usecs_to_jiffies(timeriomem_rng_data->period) > 0) { > + timeriomem_rng_timer.expires = jiffies; > + init_timer(&timeriomem_rng_timer); I don't think the init_timer() is needed - we already (correctly) initialised it at compile time? > + timeriomem_rng_ops.priv = usecs_to_jiffies( > + timeriomem_rng_data->period); > + } > + > + ret = hwrng_register(&timeriomem_rng_ops); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "problem registering\n"); > + return ret; > + } > + > + dev_info(&pdev->dev, "32bits from 0x%p @ %dus\n", > + timeriomem_rng_data->address, > + timeriomem_rng_data->period); > + > + return 0; > +} What will happen if we load this driver on machines which don't actually have the necessary hardware? Even non-x86 hardware? > +static int __devexit timeriomem_rng_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) > +{ > + del_timer(&timeriomem_rng_timer); This should be del_timer_sync(). Otherwise the timer handler could be running on another CPU during driver teardown. > + hwrng_unregister(&timeriomem_rng_ops); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static struct platform_driver timeriomem_rng_driver = { > + .driver = { > + .name = "timeriomem_rng", > + .owner = THIS_MODULE, > + }, > + .probe = timeriomem_rng_probe, > + .remove = __devexit_p(timeriomem_rng_remove), > +}; > + > +static int __init timeriomem_rng_init(void) > +{ > + return platform_driver_register(&timeriomem_rng_driver); > +} > + > +static void __exit timeriomem_rng_exit(void) > +{ > + platform_driver_unregister(&timeriomem_rng_driver); > +} > + > +module_init(timeriomem_rng_init); > +module_exit(timeriomem_rng_exit); > + > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Alexander Clouter "); > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Timer IOMEM H/W RNG driver"); > diff --git a/include/linux/timeriomem-rng.h b/include/linux/timeriomem-rng.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..16dd9e4 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/linux/timeriomem-rng.h > @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ > +/* > + * linux/include/linux/timeriomem-rng.h > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2008 Alexander Clouter > + * > + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify > + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as > + * published by the Free Software Foundation. > + */ > + > +struct timeriomem_rng_data { > + u32 __iomem *address; > + > + /* measures in usecs */ > + unsigned int period; > +}; -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/