Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:54:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:54:13 -0500 Received: from ns3.miraclelinux.com ([61.120.40.82]:22261 "EHLO dns01.miraclelinux.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:53:59 -0500 To: go@turbolinux.co.jp Cc: yakker@alacritech.com, jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com, lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@transmeta.com, davej@suse.de Cc: hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com Subject: Re: [lkcd-general] Re: status of LKCD into Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: <3C6B7B2E.2050500@turbolinux.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <3C6B51AA.6EB614C3@mandrakesoft.com> <3C6B5A2E.2C2637C7@alacritech.com> <3C6B7B2E.2050500@turbolinux.co.jp> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94.2 on XEmacs 21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20020215114220Z.hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com> Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:42:20 +0900 From: Hiro Yoshioka X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 83 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, Thanks to all. I has been asked by customers, ISV vendors and many to support a crash dump facility in the linux kernel. I'd like to know issues/concerns to be merged the LKCD into the kernel if any. By the way, who is the kernel people to maintain a dump facility? Linus? Dave? Regards, Hiro -- Hiro Yoshioka/CTO, Miracle Linux mailto:hyoshiok@miraclelinux.com http://www.miraclelinux.com From: Go Taniguchi > At my point of view, LKCD is convinced that it is the most important technology > for us. > > It seems to be LKCD is just working perfectly with our 2.4.17 kernel. > It reduces plenty of time for analysing Oops. Hence,for engineers like us, LKCD > is necessary. > > I am really looking forward that LKCD will be merged into Kernel main-tree > in the near future. If it is possible that would probably be much better if > the user ability and time for analysing can be improved. > > I really appreciate everybody's works in this super team-LKCD. > > Thanks again, > -- GO! > > Matt D. Robinson wrote: > > > A lot of progress has been made ... > > > > LKCD is currently up to 2.4.17, and should be simple to > > move into 2.5. > > > > I've asked Linus and others for inclusion in the past, and I > > think it deserves consideration for 2.5, especially now that it > > can be built into the kernel without having to be turned on. > > At least in those cases, people who want it can turn it on, > > and those that don't will never see it. > > > > The LKCD development team (over 10 engineers now) is ready. > > > > --Matt > > > > Jeff Garzik wrote: > > > >>Hiro Yoshioka wrote: > >> > >>>I have a naive question. Will the LKCD be merged into > >>>the Linus' kernel? If yes, when? wild guess? > >>> > >>I talked with Matt Robinson(sp?) at LinuxWorld-NY about LKCD for a few > >>minutes... he gave me the impression that a lot of progress has been > >>made recently. IBM apparently has some guys working on it, too. > >> > >>I've always thought Linux needs industrial strength crash dumps like the > >>other Unices. There are many benefits, but my own is self interest: > >>bug reports get 1000 times better, since you get along with the crash > >>point a lot more info about the state of the system at the time of the > >>crash. > >> > >>So, I hope LKCD is looked upon favorably by the Penguin Gods. :) > >> > >> Jeff > >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lkcd-general mailing list > > Lkcd-general@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lkcd-general > > > > > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/