Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756516AbZAMGsf (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:48:35 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751523AbZAMGs0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:48:26 -0500 Received: from mail.openmoko.org ([88.198.124.205]:43854 "EHLO mail.openmoko.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751082AbZAMGs0 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 01:48:26 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:17:45 +0530 From: Balaji Rao To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sameo@openedhand.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/7] PCF50633 support Message-ID: <20090113064743.GA3218@fedora.yogi> References: <20090105181242.7559.30087.stgit@fedora.yogi> <20090112144434.eeb1640d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090112144434.eeb1640d.akpm@linux-foundation.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1754 Lines: 51 On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 02:44:34PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 23:42:42 +0530 > Balaji Rao wrote: > > > The following series implements support for NXP PCF50633. It's basically > > an I2C device with 9 regulators, an ADC, a PMIC, a Battery Charger > > and a RTC. > > > > This chip is used in Openmoko Neo Freerunner mobile phone. > > > > The specs are open and are available at > > http://people.openmoko.org/tony_tu/GTA02/datasheet/PMU/PCF50633DS_02.pdf > > > > --- > > Balaji Rao (7): > > mfd: PCF50633 core driver > > mfd: PCF50633 adc driver > > mfd: PCF50633 gpio support > > rtc: PCF50633 rtc driver > > power_supply: PCF50633 battery charger driver > > input: PCF50633 input driver > > regulator: PCF50633 pmic driver > > You have patches here which should strictly be merged by various > different subsystem trees. That gets tricky because presumably there > are dependencies. > > What _are_ the dependencies here? Do patches 2-7 depend upon #1, perhaps? > yes, patches 2-7 depend on the first one. > If so, then one approach would be to merge the first patch into > mainline now then trickle the rest out into subsystem trees. > > Or, with suitable acks, I can merge the lot. Perhaps into 2.6.29.. > Andrew, Samuel had sent a git-pull for the linux-mfd tree containing this series a couple of days ago and now I see that it's merged. So, I think you can remove these from -mm. Thanks, Balaji -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/