Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760044AbZAMSvB (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:51:01 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755320AbZAMSuS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:50:18 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f29.google.com ([209.85.218.29]:59714 "EHLO mail-bw0-f29.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756218AbZAMSuQ (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:50:16 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=YaTCMDUx4kK+rluZFCSIvLtc9jnlPSuGn4HfRUTpa6N5II5TwDScXqz3tgKke9afTf Fv2cYa5S/071oww/A3tVXCcLg7KB6/2t/cdvxARRZHHYWcCqI0FybV0U/9efj0reZ8wG NnUSquuUoYXGwm0BmlmVrkg5fTpQkl6jKTe3A= Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:50:13 +0300 From: Cyrill Gorcunov To: Harvey Harrison Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Sam Ravnborg , LKML , Jaswinder Singh Rajput Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - fix export private data to userspace Message-ID: <20090113185013.GB14470@localhost> References: <20090113183456.GA14470@localhost> <1231871832.16221.1.camel@brick> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1231871832.16221.1.camel@brick> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 992 Lines: 29 [Harvey Harrison - Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:37:12AM -0800] | On Tue, 2009-01-13 at 21:34 +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote: | > Impact: cleanup | | > 4) setup.h - COMMAND_LINE_SIZE saved for userspace, bootloaders | > could use it. | | Doesn't this need to be (at least) _COMMAND_LINE_SIZE to avoid | polluting the namespace, not sure it can be changed though as the | horse is already out of the barn. | | Harvey | I was concerning more about lilo side, is it use this param. So here is a link http://lists.linuxcoding.com/kernel/2006-q3/msg18665.html is seems LILO has it's own definition for COMMAND_LINE_SIZE. On the other hand it touches boot protocol. Peter should know if it safe to hide/change COMMAND_LINE_SIZE. Peter? - Cyrill - -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/