Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759252AbZAMXSw (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:18:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758641AbZAMXRz (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:55 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:46050 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758497AbZAMXRx (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:17:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:17:16 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Jan Kara Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jack@suse.cz, pavel@suse.cz Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext2: Update also inode on disk when dir is IS_DIRSYNC Message-Id: <20090113151716.cefb738b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1231850522-11074-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> References: <1231850522-11074-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.20; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1796 Lines: 67 On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:42:02 +0100 Jan Kara wrote: > We used to just write changed page for IS_DIRSYNC inodes. But we also have to > update directory inode itself just for the case that we've allocated a new > block and changed i_size. > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara > CC: Pavel Machek > --- > fs/ext2/dir.c | 5 ++--- > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Andrew, would you please merge the patch? Ext3 and ext4 don't have this > problem BTW. > > diff --git a/fs/ext2/dir.c b/fs/ext2/dir.c > index 9a0fc40..7fba549 100644 > --- a/fs/ext2/dir.c > +++ b/fs/ext2/dir.c > @@ -94,11 +94,10 @@ static int ext2_commit_chunk(struct page *page, loff_t pos, unsigned len) > i_size_write(dir, pos+len); > mark_inode_dirty(dir); > } > + unlock_page(page); > > if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir)) > - err = write_one_page(page, 1); > - else > - unlock_page(page); > + err = ext2_sync_inode(dir); > But with this change we no longer sync the data page? Don't we need something like this: static int ext2_commit_chunk(struct page *page, loff_t pos, unsigned len) { struct address_space *mapping = page->mapping; struct inode *dir = mapping->host; int err = 0; dir->i_version++; block_write_end(NULL, mapping, pos, len, len, page, NULL); if (pos+len > dir->i_size) { i_size_write(dir, pos+len); mark_inode_dirty(dir); } if (IS_DIRSYNC(dir)) { err = write_one_page(page, 1); if (err == 0) err = ext2_sync_inode(dir); } else { unlock_page(page); } return err; } ? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/