Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758210AbZANBF3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:05:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752472AbZANBFS (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:05:18 -0500 Received: from kroah.org ([198.145.64.141]:60905 "EHLO coco.kroah.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752897AbZANBFR (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Jan 2009 20:05:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 17:02:23 -0800 From: Greg KH To: San Mehat Cc: Alan Cox , Brian Swetland , Robert Love , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: lowmemory android driver not needed? Message-ID: <20090114010223.GA21380@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 606 Lines: 19 Hi San, Alan Cox pointed me at the /proc//oom_adj file that controls the oom-killer score for any process as being more than sufficent to control the oom killer. This makes me wonder why you wrote the android lowmemlorykiller driver? What is that driver for that is not already present in the existing oom_* values for every process? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/