Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761242AbZANJmg (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:42:36 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1755701AbZANJmY (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:42:24 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f17.google.com ([209.85.219.17]:44391 "EHLO mail-ew0-f17.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755625AbZANJmX (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Jan 2009 04:42:23 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=eYdBERrqIbcI/urBokU9M+s/4cux7gIKu3v2akdnJ6ed+mxuYy0lPTaekuydkrnfFQ wq7zqeQo2D+Z4fxy42QtCZAmeXPV/k6fQ5fWIxbstfRzynd7LLFgd3Iv5EGQL/2cNOIn rdLZxAIFKOHp02vs1vRNEkC56IIENTVxnkNj8= Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:42:16 +0000 From: Jarek Poplawski To: David Miller Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, zbr@ioremap.net, dada1@cosmosbay.com, w@1wt.eu, ben@zeus.com, mingo@elte.hu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jens.axboe@oracle.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] tcp: splice as many packets as possible at once Message-ID: <20090114094215.GC4234@ff.dom.local> References: <20090113.232710.55011568.davem@davemloft.net> <20090114082630.GB16692@gondor.apana.org.au> <20090114085308.GB4234@ff.dom.local> <20090114.012919.117682429.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090114.012919.117682429.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1145 Lines: 29 On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 01:29:19AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Jarek Poplawski > Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:53:08 +0000 > > > Actually, I still think my second approach (the PageSlab) is probably > > (if tested) the easiest for now, because it should fix the reported > > (Willy's) problem, without any change or copy overhead for splice to > > file (which could be still wrong, but not obviously wrong). > > It's a simple fix, but as Herbert stated it leaves other ->sendpage() > implementations exposed to data corruption when the from side of the > pipe buffer is a socket. I don't think Herbert meant other ->sendpage() implementations, but I could miss something. > That, to me, is almost worse than a bad fix. > > It's definitely worse than a slower but full fix, which the copy > patch is. Sorry, I can't see how this patch could make sendpage worse. Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/